>the difference btwn these two women is that one has been
>hungry.
>
>sjp grew up kinda... not wealthy.
>
>aniston's family is new york rich.
>
>okay, so when u come from money and decide to be an actress,
>if it works or if it doesn't, not too much is at stake.
>
>if u've been poor and u've got passion and u starred in annie
>and said by golly, i'm gonna climb outta the gutter if i have
>to use this mole on my face as climbing device!, well,
>then...

Not that SJP hasn't had any touching up or masking of her appearance, but back in Ferris Bueller TV days, Aniston looks like she was sporting a different nose than now. Somehow I'm gonna hold that against her. On ther other hand, Parker has done the whole ride or die thing w/ her looks, the nose and the mole.

>u know how to have a big break, a lean period, another big
>break, another lean period.
>
>and u learn along the way how to reinvent yourself. how to
>market yourself. maybe u're gonna be the geek. maybe u're
>gonna be the beauty. u're not too proud to be one and u know
>how to take the other with a grain of salt.
>
>aniston has never had that quality.

Damn, you broke that down with backstories and psychoanalysis. Well done, as usual.

And if we can talk about Sarah Jessica Parker the person and Jennifer Aniston the person, from whatever one can learn from TV interviews, Aniston is a bit dull and incommunicative, whereas SJP, at least from Letterman appearances, has a bit more sense of humor and is a decent story-teller.