149910, RE: Is Sarah Jessica Parker taking Jennifer Aniston's roles? Posted by ricky_BUTLER, Tue Feb-07-06 03:06 PM
>>A while back I was watching The Family Stone (better than >>expected), and it kinda hit me that Sarah Jessica (that's >what >>the cool people call her) seemed to be making a little big >>screen push. I know before Sex and the City she did other >>movies (word to LA Story) > >Word 2 State & Main mayne!
and word to Honeymoon in Vegas too.
>, but with The Family Stone and the >>soon-to-be-released Failure To Launch (WTF @ Terry Bradshaw >>and Kathy Bates), she's making a real movie-star jump. > >Uh u mean Failure 2 Launch an audience right? That movie looks >terrible. And I'm shocked they're releasing it so soon after >Grandma's Boy
Yeah, it looks awful. Matthew McConaughey is really fucking up his career like its a pipe and a set of bongos.
But I saw the trailer during the previews for Match Point and it got a decent enough reaction from that audience.
>>As of now, SJP has three films inked but yet to be released, >>can she maintain whatever little wave she's riding? > >Not a chance. I'd say the Family Stone's success (if there was >any) could be attributed 2 the ensemble cast as a whole. Even >if SJP was the lead actress, Rachel McAdams is the only female >worth checking for in that movie. I mean Dermont Mulroney was >the lead actor right? Whose checking 4 him?
The Family Stone definitely increased my "interest" in Rachel McAdams, reminded me that Claire Danes is still alive, gave me hope for the Craig T Nelson comeback to come full force, proved that Diane Keaton is a legend, illustrated that deaf homosexuals are a rare breed of movie characters, but really did make me think positively of SJP. I thought most of the ads featured her prominently too.
IMDB says: off a 17mil budget it made 59 mil.
>>And as a side question, who did Aniston take roles from >>before? > >Gwyneth Paltrow?
lol
|