>Umm ... have you ever seen any other David Cronenberg films?
>That "icky" sexual content could be considered a leitmotif in
>his work. That is to say, maybe that was the point.

I don't give a fuck if the "icky" content was a hidden tribute to Marvin Gaye.

It sucked.

Just because its the filmmaker's signature don't mean it can't suck.

That makes it a sucky signature.

>It sounds to me like maybe you're holding onto too many of
>your own preconceptions regarding this film, or you were when
>you watched it.

What the fuck does that mean?

Like, you mean, as I'm watching it, and the film sucks, I'm holding onto the conception that the previous scenes that I just watched sucked?

If that is your charge, than yeah, i did that.

If a film sucks, I judge it as sucky.

I can't stand when you pretentious film types try to judge cats just because we didn't like your stupid, lame, bland, bullshit.

That movie sucked. It ain't preconceived notions.

its about a lame 'history' portion of 'history of violence'. Its about unecessary, weird sexual undertones. Its about random-ass Ed Harris, and that useless son and his squabbles with that bully.

Old boy above broke it down -- the only thing good about this film is the idea.

I mean, just let me dislike the movie, and shit.


----------------------------

O_E: Your Super-Ego's Favorite Poster.

"Any fighter that I face, I say prayers for them every night and that he and I live to fight another day."

(C) Floyd Mayweather Jr.