>*It was a very obtuse screenplay.
>*A cold female lead, a cold female supporting, a cold male
>supporting - yet it works beautifully.
>*You're in a world you instantly believe and don't question.
>*This movie could have come out in the 1960s, the 1970s, the
>1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s without any trouble translating.
>The word for that is TIMELESS, and a lot of movies aren't.
>*It would fit comfortably on the shelf of "good-to-great
>horror films" of any of the above mentioned decades.
>
>
>"Your current frequencies of understanding outweigh that which
>has been given for you to understand." Saul Williams


co-sign on *ALL* this regarding Stoker and *THIS* is why I loved it so much.

Seriously, this movie *screams* atmospheric, european horror/thriller from the early to mid 1990s, i.e. something that Jim Jarmusch, Lars von Trier or even Kar Wai Wong would make.

Wentworth Miller wrote a solid movie in his first outing as a screenwriter. I can't wait to see what else he writes that's made into a movie next (and I already have. Shit is really damn good)...