Go back to previous topic
Forum namePass The Popcorn
Topic subjecti think the answer is, he didn't interpret it as an insult
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=6&topic_id=157624&mesg_id=390018
390018, i think the answer is, he didn't interpret it as an insult
Posted by The Damaja, Sun Jul-27-08 06:11 AM
as in under normal circumstances he would be offended by such language but, given the situation they had just presented to Jimmy, the reaction was understandable/predictable even if it was bizarre


>was i the only one in the theater frustrated because there
>was NO reason why jules 'had to take it'? jules could have
>shot QT and dumped the dead body right in QT's living room,
>planted his gun in QT's hand + the other corpse's hand and it
>would be a double homicide the cops would never figure out.
>
>nothing would lead to jules at all.
>
>why wouldn't a cold blooded killer just shoot QT in the face
>and leave the corpse there. i mean, even forget planting the
>guns, just kill that smug fucker on the spot?
>
>i don't have any white friends that can call me n---r. and if
>i was a cold blooded killer, i imagine id shoot them over it.
>
>that scene was totally unrealistic to me. i cant believe so
>many people accept that idea that for some reason jules
>'couldn't' have shot QT there. or pistol whipped him into
>unconsciousness for that matter, tied him up, gagged him, and
>threw him into a closet until the wolf showed up.
>___
>
>myspace.com/spiritequality
>
>lonegunmanmedia.blogpsot.com - my comic book, the liberators,
>is available now at crooked beat records (2318 18th St NW,
>adams morgan, dc). join the movement!