Go back to previous topic | Forum name | Pass The Popcorn | Topic subject | i think the answer is, he didn't interpret it as an insult | Topic URL | http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=6&topic_id=157624&mesg_id=390018 |
390018, i think the answer is, he didn't interpret it as an insult Posted by The Damaja, Sun Jul-27-08 06:11 AM
as in under normal circumstances he would be offended by such language but, given the situation they had just presented to Jimmy, the reaction was understandable/predictable even if it was bizarre
>was i the only one in the theater frustrated because there >was NO reason why jules 'had to take it'? jules could have >shot QT and dumped the dead body right in QT's living room, >planted his gun in QT's hand + the other corpse's hand and it >would be a double homicide the cops would never figure out. > >nothing would lead to jules at all. > >why wouldn't a cold blooded killer just shoot QT in the face >and leave the corpse there. i mean, even forget planting the >guns, just kill that smug fucker on the spot? > >i don't have any white friends that can call me n---r. and if >i was a cold blooded killer, i imagine id shoot them over it. > >that scene was totally unrealistic to me. i cant believe so >many people accept that idea that for some reason jules >'couldn't' have shot QT there. or pistol whipped him into >unconsciousness for that matter, tied him up, gagged him, and >threw him into a closet until the wolf showed up. >___ > >myspace.com/spiritequality > >lonegunmanmedia.blogpsot.com - my comic book, the liberators, >is available now at crooked beat records (2318 18th St NW, >adams morgan, dc). join the movement!
| |