>
>>then a dud will
>>come out of nowhere and the song in question doesn't really
>>add value or serve purpose, or it's just not executed well.
>
>That's not an issue with sequencing, it's an issue of a bad
>song being a bad song regardless of where on the album it's
>placed.
>
a bad song is just a bad song but bad song /= filler. filler material is stuff that's put there for no real reason, or to make the album longer than it really needs to be. filler always screws up the sequencing on an album, hence my point. now you seem to equate any bad song as being filler, if that's the case then I can agree with what you're saying.