2783234, RE: i'll say this Posted by rdhull, Sat Mar-02-13 02:27 PM
>>I'd almost >>rather he'd start pulling a Bob Dylan: just show up, sit on >a >>stool, and play. The jumping and the flailing just don't >fit >>him anymore, and that's okay. >> >>Probably be better for it. >> > >Nah, he's in shape and he plays electric guitar. An electric >guitarist is 'sposed to move and groove standing up with the >faces etc. That is what is meant to be. > >Only thing Prince needs to do is make sure he spends excessive >amounts of time wah-wahing on a wah pedal like there's no >tomorrow. THAT'S what is definitely needed to complete what an >in-shape electric soul-funk-rock electric guitarist is 'sposed >to be up there doing. > >esp. since Prince got a drummer playing double-bass drum kit. >Gotta wah-wah it up it up in that scenario. > >edit: another thing that needs to be said is that in >Rock&Roll, there's always has to be an appreciation for the >"just tossed-off"/caricature type of performance. Meaning, not >everything in Rock&Roll is supposed to be a 5 star "perfect" >"everything is on-point" type of deal. Some records or >performances have to have that: "just crashing and burning in >a careless half-way effort" thing. > >Jimi gave plenty of those type of performances, so did the >Doors and Nirvana and some say Led Zep's "The song remains the >same" movie captured them barely up to their standards. That's >what rock is. Sometimes in rock, a 3 star or 2 and a half star >record is more "rock" than a 4 or 5 star record, 'cause Rock >is supposed to be about throwing out some "not so perfect >junk" sometimes. > >Like Mitch Mitchell of the Experience said the song "The Stars >that play with laughing sam's dice" was a crap song, yet I bet >some people think that song is probably one of Jimi's most >"rock" songs, because it is so "crash and burn".
gets it^^^^^
|