Go back to previous topic
Forum nameThe Lesson
Topic subjectrock and roll vs. rock.
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=5&topic_id=2777509&mesg_id=2777619
2777619, rock and roll vs. rock.
Posted by Joe Corn Mo, Tue Feb-12-13 10:39 AM

they weren't really the same thing.
rock and roll influence rock heavily.

but i'd never mistake one for the other.
i listen to the Beatles and the Stones more than
i listen to chuck berry or little richard.

and by the time you got to albums like "revolver" and "aftermath,"
the music is more than just a ripoff of rock and roll.




>>Before the Stones, rock & roll bands were generally
>>well-scrubbed, nicely groomed boys in matching jackets who
>>smiled and gave the thumbs-up in photos.
>
>http://www.b103.com/Pics/Artists/little-richard-%20veraxane%20blogspotcom.jpg
>
>http://thoughtontracks.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/screaming-jay.jpg
>
>http://www.nepr.net/sites/default/files/chuck-berry1.jpg
>
>http://blogs.tennessean.com/tunein/files/2013/01/Jerry-Lee-Lewis-1.JPG.jpg
>
>http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/252/33480609.jpg
>
>Like hell they were.
>