>
>>Just because they were movement doesn't mean they're
>classics
>>in my opinion. So Justin Beiber has classics now?
>
>lol. i mean, technically, yeah...we're discussing classics
>across the board, not personal classics. we all have
>opinions, but this is kind of a majority rules kind of thing.
>

Classics are ALL personal. Because at the end of the day, the only ones recognized are ones that are successful. It forces people to call shit albums classics. I don't see impact as the only way to judge a classic. It's all so predictable. The most successful albums get the label and then they throw in an album like Madvillainy to get some respect for the list.

It can't work like that. And I can see people calling GRODT as a classic. But when I compare that album to classics of the past, it simply isn't as good.


>Justin Beiber is being debated as having a hip hop classic?
>lol.
>

Your statement insinuated that any piece of music that starts a movement, whether its 50, Beiber, or fucking Susan Boyle is a classic and there is no two ways about it.

I mean, William Hung had a movement for a little while.


>>And hood pass or not, there isn't a damn person on these
>>boards that is revoking shit my man.
>
>
>lol.

I just can't rock with the thinking that albums MUST be considered classic if they were popular.