Go back to previous topic | Forum name | The Lesson | Topic subject | what do u mean do something big, he is 54 | Topic URL | http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=5&topic_id=2740571&mesg_id=2743279 |
2743279, what do u mean do something big, he is 54 Posted by Tim The Creator, Mon Sep-24-12 08:45 PM
>>>>>I still like his music - some of it but the fact is, >>>Prince >>>>>is living off of his legacy these days. >>>> >>>>so? >>>> >>>>> >>>>>While I certainly look forward to new music from him, I >>>>don't >>>>>think he'll be releasing anything that makes me yearn to >>>>hear >>>>>it. >>>> >>>>ok >>>> >>>> >>>>>His last hit was in 1993... things dried up for the guy >>>very >>>>>soon after the name change. >>>> >>>>2004 Rolling Stone magazine named Prince as the >>>>highest-earning musician in the world, with an annual >>income >>>>of $56.5 million. >>>> >>>> >>>>3121 gave Prince his first No.1 debut on the Billboard 200 >>>>with the album >>>> >>>>broke records in London tour >>>> >>>>lflower No.2 on the Billboard 200 >>>> >>>>won some grammy awards >>>> >>>> >>>>yeah, that's really dried up >>> >>> >>>Listen man - I'm a major Prince fan as well but these stats >>>that you've pulled out here need to be looked at in more >>>detail. >>> >>>Sure Prince had a number 1 record with 3121 but did the >>record >>>have any songs that really captured the attention of the >>music >>>buying public that he was attempting to capture? How long >>>after selling a 168,000 copies of the record in its first >>week >>>or so did the record fall off the charts? >> >> >>Sounds like the norm for most artist during that time >period. >>Fact: It was a #1. >> >>> >>>The Grammy award wins don't say much considering he was >>>shunned by them during his artistic and commercial peak - a >>>run of records that will forever be remembered and >idiolized. >> >>>The Grammy's are no longer a legitimate artistic board - >>it's >>>a corporate party for corporate artists and executives. >> >> >>A win is a win. >> >> >>>While I'm happy to see that Prince continues to play >arenas, >>I >>>saw him three times on the Welcome 2 Canada tour and all I >>can >>>say is that my wife and I both agreed that he looked like >he >>>was bored. It was neat to see him play the venue but the >>>Lovesexy era or Gold era Prince would wipe the floor with >>this >>>guy. >> >> >>Yet you know Prince was bored because he told you that? >> >> >> >>>Now, Prince in a tiny club (2500 people) in Montreal is >>>another story! >> >>Again, far from "dried up." >> >>> >>>But enough with the little stats - us fans going out and >>>buying a record in its first week and getting a number one >>is >>>hardly a success. Had the sales continued over a longer >>>amount of time as a result of having a legitimate song on >>>radio that captured the people's attention, well then you'd >>>have a leg to stand on but right now, this argument is >weak. >> >> >>Far from "dried up." >> >>Every other artist can live off a legacy, but the minute >>Prince does it, he is "dried up" >>lost his touch, etc, yet you same dried up posters will be >in >>chicago dressing like the lost member of The Time screaming >>like a bitch when you hear the intro chords to Purple Rain, >or >>even tour as a prince cover band, yet Prince is dried up. >> >>Prince is doing what he wants to do, the same Prince you old >>folks grew up on. He just doing things you don't like or >>disagree with later in his life, but yet you old fuckers >>complain complain, yet you are still drawn in by anything he >>records. >> >>still buying the albums, still debating everything, still >>showing up @ his shows, still wishing to be a member of his >>band, still checking for his new stuff, and still wanting >> >>yet he is "dried up, or lost his touch" > > >These are the things fans do - however, I'm getting the >impression you don't know what it was like to discover She's >Always In My Hair or to hear the screams of La la la He He Hee >after finding them on the b-side of an album track. > >Prince was far more clever and sonically interesting back >during his golden era which in my opinion lasted from 78 - 95. > He was the baddest rockstar and songwriter for a very long >time. > >However, I still look foward to new music from Prince. I also >applaud his need to continue searching for new sounds. The >guy is still so much bigger than today's artists. He just >appears to lack the motivation to do something big.
| |