>Wow....
>
>this is a prime example of what I've been saying for years..
>
>YOU MAKE SHIT UP....
>
>You read someone elses tweet, then ran to Okayplayer claiming
>that YOU were peeping "twitter reactions" ...then going on to
>just make up quotes about crackheads and auntie's music..
>
>all that shit was just made up...

Did you read the tweet I linked?

My statement echoed Amy's quote almost word-for-word. So, uh... where is part that I'm supposed to have made up?

Or are you talking about the part where I said young people were saying "Who the f**k is this crackhead-looking n***a?"

Dude, I read literally THOUSANDS of tweets when I analyze a live television event. Do you think that the fact that I cited Amy's tweet as the one that was in front of me when I was posting and hence influenced my wording... that that was the ONLY tweet I read that night?

Look... I;m not gonna argue with you about some retarded BS like this. Why don't you go to Twitter and search for "D'Angelo" and "#BETawards"... You'll probably find a tweet worded almost exactly as I said. And you will also find many young (and old) people asking why they should care about D while some other (old) people shake their fists and curse at them for not being enraptured by The Soul Messiah.

>you asked why people are questioning why your opinions about
>D'Angelo speak to some inadequecy in your life...That's why..
>
>honestly who does that??
>
>it just seems super weird..
>
>Read what someone else says...then run to a message board to
>misrepresent, make shit up, exaggerate and lie..
>
>wow...
>
>it's almost sad really....
>
>you really need to look at yourself dude and ask why is this
>shit so important to you where you would do funny style shit
>like that.
>
>it's not age appropriate for you at all...

LOL look at you working yourself into a sermon over some nonsense that anybody with eyes and a working brain can see is a figment of your imagination.

>this pretty much proves what I've been saying for years. The
>root of the so-called beef on the lesson is that you are just
>a very dishonest dude and lack the intellectual honesty and
>character to have reasonable mature debates with Warren
>Coolidge...

Yeah... That's GOT to be it.

You got it all figured out, chief!

(I think a more relevant psychological question would be why it's never enough for your to disagree with me... You always have to reassure yourself that you are my intellectual superior. Not sure why you're so obsessed with that)

(and you're not, by the way)