i get the impression there's something you want to skewer but are holding back and trying to look at the bigger picture because you figure it will evoke a more fervent response.
but ok, so you are just weighing the merits of "critics" and "objectivity" in "criticism" pro vs. amateur?
doesn't this seem sort of simplistic and passe to you?
i mean people have been asking similar things about "critics" for decades - this is hardly a revolutionary conversation.