>i'm not a critic
>i can understand if you were a paid critic
>and had to write an article
>reviewin' an lp
>and you want to give the public an "unbiased" opinion
>which i don't believe is possible
>
>you have to have some bias
>otherwise, everything made would be dope
>but
>
>there are standards to which you compare what you listen to
>even if not made in the same vein
>
>because, how can you say
>that this was quality, or this is good, but not for me
>
>and that not come across as biased or objective?
>
>sounds like a plea cop, that you just don't
>want to hurt any feelings or burn any bridges,
>professional or personal
>
>let's discuss
>
>please show me if i'm wrong
>i'm open
>this is a discussion
>not my opinion is better than yours