stevie's were brilliant
(although the vinyl still sounds great).

the beatles' were awesome
(i think i prefer the remastered CD of abbey road to the vinyl)


the sly remasters i could have done without, like you said.
same goes for the stones' "exile on mainstreet," although the
"let it bleed" remastered sounds really great.




it really all depends.


mostly, i'm just curious... b/c sometimes
they bring things to life in a way that the original issue didn't
capture the same way.




and all of the Prince CD's sound terrible anyway
when compared to the vinyl, so i'm pretty curious
as to what they came up with.


>i have all the albums on LP already and theyre all in fine
>condition so theres no point in getting these for me. though
>its cool that vinyl remasters are out there.
>
>i really dont care about cd remasters though.
>
>i dont need to hear his or anyones music ultra cleaned up. i
>sold my remastered funkadelic cds as they were so clean (and
>almost mp3 sounding as a result) that they ruined the music
>for me. it didnt sound like what i remembered. some remasters
>are good, like stevie and bob marleys albums, but im not crazy
>about them. the original albums are just fine. a lot of the
>time the ancient cds from the early 90s are just fine too. i
>dont need my music pristine and made extra loud to enjoy it. i
>like my vinyl copy of sly's riot album. i didnt like the
>cleaned up remaster they put out in the 00s.