2609186, RE: lol @ revisionism Posted by howardlloyd, Fri Sep-30-11 10:47 AM
>so all that king of NY talk was something just a few rap nerds >were concerned about... yeah.
you can be king of NY (for a period) and still not be GOAT genius. in my first post i said he was K.O.N.Y.
>LOOOOOOOL at referring to a magazine, I could give a fuck >which one, as a barometer for who was the best at the time. >and fuck going by the opinions of some jaded, headstrong heads >(who just like today) cant acknowledge anything new as great >without a caveat.
man...i could give a fuck about a magazine either...but the shit was the UNANIMOUS opinion. if u said anybody other than ra-krs-slick rick-kool g or kane....everyone would look at funny. it wasnt no disputing it.
>>wu came at big like he was a nobody. anybody ever come at >Ra >>like that? > > >Kane almost did.
almost...maybe...perhaps ..no!! shark niggas...saying BIG was living vicariously through UN
haha...catholic school boy
>thats 12 years. longer than Biggie was active.
again...by the time mike matured to serious artist... he was considered a great. prolly around the same time that bid died.
u still havent addressed why all the others were considered amongst the best out the gate
explain nas for instance
|