Go back to previous topic
Forum nameThe Lesson
Topic subjectRE: lol @ revisionism
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=5&topic_id=2608374&mesg_id=2609082
2609082, RE: lol @ revisionism
Posted by howardlloyd, Fri Sep-30-11 07:11 AM

>and the Rakim, KRS and Kane's had the distinct advantage of
>being the first to do many things, Big came in an era where
>hip hop was not new to many, although to some it continued to
>be a new thing for years.

hip hop was on record for over 7 years by the time any of em dropped. why were THEY the ones with the opportunity to do new things...??

no one has come with a new style since them or big? did Andre 3000 do new shit after BIG?
lol

>so you're argument is pretty feeble.
those in glass houses

again...Big made a good first album (heightened by remixes and B-sides) that was borderline too commercial and a second album that was overly commercial. many of the "true" heads was on the fence not over his lyrical skill but his albums and puffy connection/marketing