Go back to previous topic
Forum nameGeneral Discussion
Topic subjectNope.
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=13477453&mesg_id=13488505
13488505, Nope.
Posted by handle, Sun Jul-16-23 08:06 PM
That was an anniversary post, I deleted it.

Here's a CNN link going in:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/11/health/covid-origins-researchers-house-subcommittee-hearing/index.html

The Nation link before:
https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/covid-origins-congress-hearing/

Article about hearings in Nature:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02261-w

Swipe:
"Republicans in the US House of Representatives have accused the authors of a 2020 commentary in a scientific journal of colluding with government officials to stifle conversation about COVID-19 origins. Two of the authors — Kristian Andersen, an evolutionary biologist at Scripps Research in La Jolla, California, and Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana — appeared before the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic on 11 July to categorically deny these allegations.

Rumours spread in early 2020 that SARS-CoV-2 was a bioweapon created at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. So, Andersen, Garry and their co-authors looked at the available genomic data to determine whether the sections that encode the spike protein — which the virus uses to gain entry to cells — showed signs of genetic engineering. The scientists published their findings as a commentary in Nature Medicine1, in which they concluded that they “do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible”. (Nature is editorially independent of Nature Medicine, and Nature’s news team is independent of its journal team.)"

You're watching Benghnzai hearings mixed with "The Twitter files." It's bullocks. They'll grandstand while going over years old communications that don't support there theory but promise if you read it just the right way, then add a little imagination then you see why SCIENCE tried to protect the Chinese. (They won't mention the myriad of actual scientific AND political failures that actually happened.)


Your position is still:
Scientists in Wuhan engineered a virus deliberately then it accidentally infected the scientists who then spread it in China and beyond. Also: The deliberate genetic engineering is so advanced, or so clever, that it can't YET be spotted by other scientists.

Maybe RFK Jr.s's testimony would finally prove your theory next week:
https://nypost.com/2023/07/12/rfk-jr-will-testify-before-house-panel-on-government-censorship/