because I see you don’t understand the history here.

Here actions as a judge have been in question prior to her being nominated.
This isn’t some newly constructed political attack.

The Washington advocacy group for constitutional judges and the rule of law have
constantly questioned her actions and theories as a judge. From the time
she was appointed by Obama up until the time she was nominated by Biden,
she gave out reduced sentences to sex offenders as a trial judge, and consistently went against the recommended sentencing by prosecutors.


“She served as the tip of the spear in weakening federal sentencing policy for child pornographers as vice chair of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, where she ignored the advice of expert witnesses who disputed her theory that child pornographers are somehow not pedophiles,” said Mike Davis, president of the Article III Project, a Washington advocacy group for constitutional judges and the rule of law.

This ain’t new, buddy. This has always been her reputation. The truth and facts are there, no matter how many times you want to skate around it.