13451311, Jesus christ. FORMER CEO. Not the ceo. The former ceo. |
Posted by Cold Truth, Fri Jan-07-22 02:32 PM
>It's even worse that what you shared, lol
>Pfizer just elected the CEO of Thompson Reuters to it's Board
Former. Key word there. Critical, actually.
He’s currently chairman of the board of trustees, of the thompson reuters chiaritable foundation.
You rant a lot below about this, yet you said nothjng at all that remotely makes a case for “collusion”.
So what evidence do you have to support the collusion claim, specifically the ways in which that collusion has impacted Reuters COVID information?
>In a sane, non-corporate hellscape of a society, this would be
>grounds for censure/investigation/govt oversight...here
>Honestly man, debating with diehard liberal vaxxers is
>It's simply not about public health for these cats.
>it's about a superiority complex.
>One could very easily be vaccinated and boosted and see that
>that combo...ain't a long term solution.
>There's way too many objective problems with the "just get the
>vaxxx!!!!" idea, even if you remove the adverse effects of the
>vaxx, Pfizer's sketchiness, etc...
>The vaxx doesn't sterilize the disease, so it's going to
>and you simply can not inject people with an unknown chemical
>compound for each new mutation, in perpetuity.
>AND the pfizer product wears off after about 6 months.
>You can't inject an unknown chemical compound every 6 months
>into a large population, in perpetuity.
>NO ONE knows the long term side effects
>There appears to be some crossover point where certain
>co-morbidities overwhelm the protections supposedly offered by
>So solutions beyond the Pfizer product objectively MUST
>They simply *have* to be developed.
>Thankfully, the global scientific community don't get their
>"science" from MSNBC, lol