Go back to previous topic | Forum name | General Discussion | Topic subject | No, it would not fall under this description | Topic URL | http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=13448023&mesg_id=13448228 |
13448228, No, it would not fall under this description Posted by auragin_boi, Thu Nov-18-21 09:52 AM
This clause is meant to prevent companies from discriminating against people that might increase their benefits spend due to something pre-existing.
Vaccine refusal is not pre-existing or related to genetics and therefore does not qualify under this clause. Now what IS protected is discrimination based on a medical condition which prevents someone from getting vaccinated. Which most companies are not doing.
| |