|Go back to previous topic|
|Forum name||General Discussion|
|Topic subject||No, it would not fall under this description|
13448228, No, it would not fall under this description|
Posted by auragin_boi, Thu Nov-18-21 09:52 AM
This clause is meant to prevent companies from discriminating against people that might increase their benefits spend due to something pre-existing.
Vaccine refusal is not pre-existing or related to genetics and therefore does not qualify under this clause. Now what IS protected is discrimination based on a medical condition which prevents someone from getting vaccinated. Which most companies are not doing.