... the fact that he's ignoring the larger issues that exist within the "blind" justice system that the rest of us have been very clearly referencing or alluding to.

I think most of us are pretty well aware of the fact that the judge decides what evidence is allowed and not allowed, and that the prosecution may have stepped over a line in this instance.

The question being posed is why certain evidence was disallowed, if it, for example, clearly helps to illustrate a motive (which is huge in murder cases), or something else.

Yes - the judge disallowed that evidence, and the prosecution then alluded to it. But does that make it right ?

Add that on top of all the other questionable and shady actions from this judge and it's just another trial in ameriKKKa.

TLDR; these cases aren't black and white (no pun intended but ...) like this troll clown keeps saying they are. Context matters. The judge is still human and appears to very likely be a MAGA nazi.