Apparently the judge ruled this was inadmissible. Not sure why...i just started tuning in. But once he rules its out, prosecution wilding by bringing it up.

>This is why the prosecutor's line of questioning- which got shot down by the judge- about his prior comments about wishing he were there with his gun so he could shoot people damaging property. Because it establishes his entire motive for going there, with the gun, to begin with.

Agree 100% about him inserting himself into the situation, i just don't know if that makes any of his actions illegal.