>And I already spoke on why it isn’t proper or functional
>attire for a male
>human being.

I'll rephrase; do you have an actual good argument?

Something rational or reasonable?

>It doesn’t provide support for a man’s
>genitals

What do you think underwear does?

and it restricts
>forward and backward motion because it is not aerodynamic,
>thus limiting
>a man from properly exerting himself.

Exerting himself in what way?

So i take it that you're equally deeply concerned with a woman's ability to exert herself in a dress as well?

>If you don’t own or wear one, then you can’t speak in
>defense of a man wearing
>a dress.

Yes, I can. In fact, I have. But I'll play. By this line of thinking, as a man who presumably also doesn't wear a dress, you can't speak against it

So don’t even try it, because it’s not part of
>your wardrobe,

It doesn't need to be in my wardrobe.

because you
>no damn well a man shouldn’t wear a dress.

No, I don't know that. In fact, I completely disagree with that.

You still haven't made a single reasonable argument for whys

>So whatever argument you present in support of a man wearing a
>dress is fruitless.

I don't need to argue to support it. YOU need to present a reasonable argument against it, which you have not done.

You made the claim. It's on you to support that claim with good evidence and sound reasoning.

At best, you've conveyed reasons why you wouldn't wear one, and are now projecting your personal reasons onto all men.