why it's different is this...

In June, doctors filed a lawsuit against the Federal Gov't over the use of "experimental vaccines" on children under 16. Quoting this next part:

"Dr. Angelina Farella, pediatric medical director for "America's Frontline Doctors," stated, "We've never seen this level of side effects for any vaccine without the FDA taking action.

The Rotavirus vaccine was pulled for 15 cases of non-lethal side effects, and the Swine Flu vaccine was pulled for 25 deaths. But now, by the CDC's data, we see a 12,000 percent increase in deaths with these vaccines, and they're still talking about giving this to our kids." She said children are statistically at zero risks for COVID-19.

The data shows that the recovery rate for COVID-19 patients under the age of 20 is 99.997 percent."

end quote

"The definition of what qualifies as a vaccination was changed to allow approval of this one.
Traditionally, a vaccine is giving someone a protein, antigen, partial or whole pathogen. Injecting RNA into a human being doesn't historically fall under the definition of a vaccine. Verbiage was shifted in the federal register to approve it. This is experimental biological gene therapy immune modulatory injection. Injecting ppl with a synthetic sequence of nucleic acid has never been done on a large scale in human history. RNA trials in mammals have led to odd cancers and autoimmune diseases from 6 to 12 months after the injection.

Also, if there is a treatment for a disease, the federal gov't cannot approve a vaccination. The NIH (who is involved in approving medications) cohold the patent to the vaccine with Moderna. There you have the gov't in bed with a private company, vending a product that they want to give to everyone. Conflict of interest. They don't want a therapy to work, because then they can't sell the vaccine.

But this just notes from a curious nigga trying to do a lil research."