>Well to one of your first points the CDC is not publishing or
>reporting or taking in data on breakthrough cases so that was
>actually what sowed some doubt, much before reading that
>article.

I have worked for bio-tech firms INCLUDING Pfizer in the IT department and I have NO IDEA how to interpret any of the data.

Maybe it does take time to get enough data to actually use in their calculation.

Meanwhile people who DO NOT know how to interpret the data, like me, or Alex Berenson may misidentify something and cause a panic.

I'd say he's causing panic and doubt as a JOB . Same way some people's job was to sow doubt on whether Obama was a US citizen or not.

AND HIS BULLSHIT IS THE SAME!

Now in some period of time , say a month, we may see data ANLYSIS that says delta breakthrough are really bad - or we may not.

But why do you think the CDC is holding the info?

Alex thinks it's because they want to 'sucker' people into getting vaccinated for some reason. YOU CAN'T TRUST HIM.