>> Seems like that set the low bar for these kinda lawsuits.
>
>Key words "these kinda lawsuits." The personal injury field of
>law seems quite healthy. The job of personal injury lawyers
>are to file lawsuits. Once the "low bar" was set, anything
>greater-than or equal to those injuries was lawsuit-worthy in
>the eyes of a lawyer (because they make money win or lose),
>whether or not it had the same merit as that case. Legal
>precedent.

Except this was anything but a low bar- which is what I addressed.

>The reason the put "CAUTION: Food will be hot!" on TV dinners
>that you put in the over at 400+ degrees F.
>
>> To avoid lawsuits.
>
>
>
>All I did was point out a cause-and-effect. I didn't make any
>statement about the merit's of Ms. Liebeck's lawsuit.

......you called her case a low bar.

How about you dig in to the facts of that case before calling it a "low bar" and then making these absurd generalizations that don't actually fit.