*shrug*

People wouldn't have to select the cash instead of the prescribed benefit(s) unless they wanted to. If it was signed into law and they wanted no parts of it, they wouldn't be kicked off of their existing benefits. So wtf are raving about.

There's lots of other considerations that you're not taking into account too, like the work requirements for some of these programs or the fact that income like TANF can only be used for a maximum of 5 years in one's lifetime (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporary_Assistance_for_Needy_Families).

But hey, according to you guys, low-income ppl are way too dumb to factor in shit like that. And I'm sure no low-income families have dependents that are 18+ either. I mean, what could an impoverished family possibly gain from any parents, grandparents, and dependents 18+ receiving $1000 dividend every month??

You're so right about this rjcc, ppl should totally always listen to you. Especially since you're so pleasant to engage with :)


>IT'S MORE THAN 1000 ANDREW YANG WANTS YOU TO DIE YOU DUMB MOTHERFUCKER