>>focusing on this sham process?
>>
>>Why not spend at least a little bit of time communicating
>how
>>this is all fucked up?
>>
>
>https://twitter.com/keithboykin/status/1316071315611230210
>
>

Ah okay, good to see. Still, they all should have spent at least the entire first day on this stuff imo.

>
>>
>>Instead they jumped right into norms, as usual.
>>
>>I read Feinstein practically gave her a word hug this am.
>>
>
>Yeah that was ridiculous.
>
>>Not only is she going to get nominated, my guess is zero GOP
>>defect. The Dems haven't- and won't- give them a good
>reason
>>to.
>>
>
>What GOP would defect in any scenario ? Mitt is already saying
>both sides.
>
>https://twitter.com/MittRomney/status/1316023618422235138?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Good point. I guess in my mind if the Dems made a case about the sham process, ACA, etc...at least someone like collins might defect cuz she is in the middle of an election.



>
>
>>
>>**I'd like to think their long-term plan is to use this as a
>>reason to expand the court...but they are feckless idiots
>who
>>are ALREADY losing that argument by playing defense.
>>
>>Not to mention, say Biden adds two judges (he won't)...its
>>still 6-5 conservative majority.
>>
>
>Biden already caved on that.
>
>https://www.npr.org/2020/10/13/923213582/biden-says-hes-not-a-fan-of-expanding-the-supreme-court
>

Yeah I just wish they would all answer that question by pointing out it is the GOP who have packed the courts.