>focusing on this sham process?
>
>Why not spend at least a little bit of time communicating how
>this is all fucked up?
>

https://twitter.com/keithboykin/status/1316071315611230210



>
>Instead they jumped right into norms, as usual.
>
>I read Feinstein practically gave her a word hug this am.
>

Yeah that was ridiculous.

>Not only is she going to get nominated, my guess is zero GOP
>defect. The Dems haven't- and won't- give them a good reason
>to.
>

What GOP would defect in any scenario ? Mitt is already saying both sides.

https://twitter.com/MittRomney/status/1316023618422235138?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet


>
>**I'd like to think their long-term plan is to use this as a
>reason to expand the court...but they are feckless idiots who
>are ALREADY losing that argument by playing defense.
>
>Not to mention, say Biden adds two judges (he won't)...its
>still 6-5 conservative majority.
>

Biden already caved on that.

https://www.npr.org/2020/10/13/923213582/biden-says-hes-not-a-fan-of-expanding-the-supreme-court