13401799, That wasn't the "argument" tho. Posted by Boogie Stimuli, Sun Aug-30-20 12:22 PM
>isn't exactly a defense that holds up against the argument >that this 40 year old man is dealing with someone who doesn't >have enough life experience to know that he sucks
The fact that he's dealing with a young person who doesn't have life experience to see through BS is a point I agree with. That wasn't the "argument" tho. The "argument" was that they were having sex before marriage. What's been said doesn't imply that, but actually implies the opposite.
>and adding in that what he's doing is being presented to her >as god's will > >well
Yeah, it's religious BS, which I don't care to defend. I'm only saying that being "within God's will" under their faith means they wouldn't have had sex before marriage... which was the accusation.
|