And I don't know who you're talking about.


>You listed the things she "dealt in", i.e, ego and insults, as
>though either have ANYTHING to do with what happened.

I'm responding to a comment about this post, not a comment about the what happened to Jag. I didn't say or intimate that anything she said had anything to do with what happened to her. I pointed out that the rhetoric she participated in mirrors what the commentor is complaining about in this post, so it shouldn't be a surprise.


>Then, you acknowledge that her "energy" stems from her
>experience...as though you didn't just shit on her reaction,
>while treating the actual experience- literally the only part
>that matters- as an aside.

This post is a response to Jag's posts. When the people she's accused of these wrongdoings made public statements, then I'l' comment on that. But her words and actions aren't beyond scrutiny because you perceive her to be a victim.