it seemed like he was saying the fight started with meg and kelsey...then everyone fighting...then eventually turned into everyone beating up meg.

could you even prove that any injuries meg incurred came from torys hands?

and how could you prove tory wasnt defending himself in the melee?

i think thats why they didnt even look at assault (without the gun). the details are much murkier than even the gun case.

i mean...even *we* think getting a conviction on the gun assault is iffy at this point. but theres at least evidence a gun was fired, someone likely held the gun when it was fired, and there were injuries resulting from that gun being fired. what evidence is there on a beating (specifically implicating tory) other than a 3rd party who couldnt even id any of the people by face?