https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/25/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-debate.html

says she raised 9M in the 3 days after the debate, and had raised 21M by the date of the article's publication (last month).

I think I first saw someone talking about her haul on twitter, so maybe they misquoted the amounts or I misread (I probably misread, lol. My bad :( I'm usually more careful tho bc I *hate misinfo/disinfo).

Here's an article about her SuperPAC too tho. And I always have facts bc I'm a policy/politics junkie (For multiple countries too. But American politics is the most interesting/far-reaching lol):

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/elizabeth-warren-now-has-the-largest-super-pac-in-the-democratic-field_n_5e593d56c5b6beedb4ea7d0f


>i keed
>
>why do you always have facts?
>
>you could be 100% right. is there data to back this up? i
>think it would be pretty simple to prove no? if she was
>averaging $20 or whatever per donation before Jan and now shes
>getting people maxing out then thats pretty obvious.
>
>getting such a big jump is definitely odd especially when the
>votes arent there. last i saw she was claiming 1,250,000 plus
>donors. i think thats a big amount, only comparable to bernie
>(which is higher) right? i think in an email or on her sub i
>had seen that her donor count in feb was like 250k. i dont
>know if that was only for the debate week or if it was
>actually donation counts instead of donor count. that would
>still give an average donation amount of over $100 so it would
>be odd.