Go back to previous topic
Forum nameGeneral Discussion
Topic subjectHm. Interesting interpretation. I don't think it's clear and I disagree.
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=13368663&mesg_id=13369021
13369021, Hm. Interesting interpretation. I don't think it's clear and I disagree.
Posted by kfine, Wed Feb-26-20 09:58 AM

I think one could just as easily think of the context, i.e the constant Castro/Cuba talk leading up to the debate and during it, and walk away with my interpretation as well. It's the interpretation I heard several network pundits use as well (tho that's not saying much lol)

He probably deleted bc so many were (mis?)interpreting it to mean a knock on US civil rights/MLK.

Haven't checked twitter yet today tho, just assuming its a misinfo cesspool as usual lol


>
>What he actually said:
>
>“We can’t afford a scenario where it comes down to Donald
>Trump with his nostalgia for the social order of the 1950's
>and Bernie Sanders with his nostalgia for the revolutionary
>politics of the 1960's."
>
>Nowhere did he mention "Cuban politics" - and given his
>reference to the "social order of the 50's" - it's clear he's
>talking about U.S. political climate.
>
>
>
>
>-->