13369021, Hm. Interesting interpretation. I don't think it's clear and I disagree. Posted by kfine, Wed Feb-26-20 09:58 AM
I think one could just as easily think of the context, i.e the constant Castro/Cuba talk leading up to the debate and during it, and walk away with my interpretation as well. It's the interpretation I heard several network pundits use as well (tho that's not saying much lol)
He probably deleted bc so many were (mis?)interpreting it to mean a knock on US civil rights/MLK.
Haven't checked twitter yet today tho, just assuming its a misinfo cesspool as usual lol
> >What he actually said: > >“We can’t afford a scenario where it comes down to Donald >Trump with his nostalgia for the social order of the 1950's >and Bernie Sanders with his nostalgia for the revolutionary >politics of the 1960's." > >Nowhere did he mention "Cuban politics" - and given his >reference to the "social order of the 50's" - it's clear he's >talking about U.S. political climate. > > > > >-->
|