>the "leftist" argument was Hillary was a neo-liberal war hawk
>who could give a fuck about the working class, and that Kamala
>was a "cop" (who heavily punished the working class to get
>ahead), not progressive on the material interests of the
>voting public.
>
>Bloomberg.... is something else. at best a combination of the
>two but even worse. like the kind of video game boss that
>Trump wishes he could be. the worst of the neoliberals,
>warhawks, and cops, in one man.

Right. So by going above and beyond to paint HRC, Kamala, and others as "Bloombergs" (according to your definitions) or worse, far-left hysteria about an actual Bloomberg ends up not holding much weight. Because *everyone* that's not Bernie has been painted as some neolib racist cop warhawk republican trying to exterminate the working class (or some variation).