>it has literally been done for every other candidate. they
>all have a laundry list of critiques (constantly
>launched/highlighted by the sanders campaign).

Again - check your post count here and see how many times you (at least try to) critique Sanders vs other candidates. Vast disparity in your analysis.

Not sure why you’re trying to act like you’re just trying to vet and do oppo research - you’re clearly making the case that you think Sanders is the weakest candidate of the top tier (which is hilarious given the egregious pass you’ve given Biden).

And that’s perfectly fine if that’s your stance. Just own it and be real and stop trying to feign objectivity.

>you think repubs arent waiting with a stockpile of oppo
>research on sanders (who hasnt been put through the ringer in
>either of the past 2 primaries)?

Lol yea ok. He’s only been cheated out of a primary and smeared as wholly unelectable, a do-nothing Soviet-style socialist, and posited as some craven creature who nobody likes. It’s not as if he isn’t the continual target of corporate media smears (albeit ineffective ones). Such a cake walk for Sanders.

You’re in here just throwing links at the wall thinking it sticks. You don’t think the Clinton machine (who smeared Obama as a *Muslim* of questionable character) didn’t do everything they can to denigrate Sanders? They are still doing it - it’s just not sticking.

For somebody who spends an awful lot of time on politics - you seemingly haven’t learned anything from 2016. These purity tests don’t work. Donald F’ing Trump is President - a candidate so corrupt that you could fill a museum with negative oppo research on him.

Yet you’re in here really making the case that Sanders - who has essentially been who he is for a half century - is somehow not going to survive a general election in *this* political climate.

Yikes.



-->