Go back to previous topic
Forum nameGeneral Discussion
Topic subjecthow informed is the comparison though?
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=13354635&mesg_id=13359007
13359007, how informed is the comparison though?
Posted by mista k5, Wed Dec-11-19 01:39 PM
for the general public the messaging was that warren was going to raise taxes. she is going to make you lose your private insurance. she was going to tear down murrica

murrica loves to chose to pay more for less!

an informed comparison would be to discuss what is actually covered and what the cost would be for people.

pete would hint that his option was to give you all the benefits of M4A but still leave a choice for those who love to pay insurance companies more for less. instead of a flavor of medicare he really is only offering a whiff. i dont think people would really support that if they understood it.

i do think going with M4A would be the best option, the most cost effective option in the long term. the most humane option. the most logical option. because of the effective fear campaign i would be okay with a public option that actually offered much more than any being proposed outside of warren if it means we get something done versus we dont.

theres no question that the GOP will attack equally any of the dems proposals as socialist, and hurting the american people. not sure why were caving to them already.