again and realized.. maybe they're talking about Pete putting pressure on Warren to cost it during the debates??? I guess I could see how folks could misconstrue that as him extolling the virtues of M4A on one hand and then attacking it on the other... and thus a flip flop???

I still wouldn't call it that tho... more like politics 101, lol.
I mean he is trying to win the nomination *shrug* Plus Biden focused his attacks on M4A costs and pay-fors too.

Besides, they're the top-polling candidates campaigning on a public option, it's exactly what they should have done! Especially since M4A's colossal pricetag and how it could be paid for are it's biggest weaknesses lol.

Anywho. Yes please do wait until sober before posting on okp, always a good idea haha


>... after I sent my post. I went to respond to you but then
>got sidetracked and have been drinking lol; so I planned - and
>still plan - to revisit this tomorrow with you. Cause you're
>probably onto something - I may or may not be guilty of buying
>into the "m4a flip flip" narrative and pluralizing it. So I
>want to be better researched and more sober before I respond
>lol.
>
>That said, I've been skeptical of Pete from day one because of
>the Darryl Boykins situation - my condemnation of which I
>stand by, but also may be skewing my opinion of him overall.
>
>