Go back to previous topic
Forum nameGeneral Discussion
Topic subjectThe whole SB police chief story is such a non-factor, speaks for itself.
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=13354635&mesg_id=13356138
13356138, The whole SB police chief story is such a non-factor, speaks for itself.
Posted by Lurkmode, Fri Nov-15-19 03:22 PM
>
>I think what it is... is they don't produce news to inform.
>Just massive info turds for people who already hate the same
>people they hate or like the same people they like. Tbh I just
>dislike aggressive opinion journalism in general, regardless
>of format. So ya.
>

You do know that you can click on the links they use in their stories and read from a different source.

Do you hate local news

https://www.abc57.com/news/insider-gives-details-on-scandal-origin-buttigieg-targeted-on-recordings

https://www.southbendtribune.com/news/publicsafety/south-bend-police-chief-ron-teachman-leaving-to-work-for/article_6ae06cf1-3ab8-50df-86d1-131d8fd95d7d.html

Do you hate city officials confirmed redacted Officer Reports ?

Do you hate campaign finance reports ?

>Anyway. I have no idea why they're so obsessed with him. Or
>what tectonic shift in US democracy yall think will be caused
>by the minute contextual details of "why" the illegall
>eavesdropping on those calls began.

So misleading your friend with information that was wrong is just a "minute contextual detail" ?


But there's not really
>anything new I could read about the case that could change my
>position.


Oh see no evil, hear no evil, your mind is made up already.


I think racism in any police force is a problem and
>should be dealt with accordingly. I also think the way those
>officers went about trying to expose racism in their police
>force was a problem to be dealt with accordingly. These are
>not mutually exclusive ideas.
>

Wait you think racism is a problem even though you just said "The whole SB police chief story is such a non-factor" ?

>What would yall have had a mayor do instead anyway? Knowingly
>violate a federal statute to settle a personnel issue? Join
>members of his police force in illegal activity being
>investigated by the FBI? Exacerbate unrest in the city that
>recently elected him based on the unsubstantiated claims of
>police personnel under federal investigation?? Smh come on
>

A mayor could investigate the racist police or tell his donors not to help the racist police. It's possible to do that without "knowingly violating a federal statute. The mayor doesn't have to join illegal activity to investigate racist cops. A cover up for racist cops is not the only solution that will keep the city peaceful. Seriously doing more to fight racism is not a stretch or wtf moment.