Go back to previous topic | Forum name | General Discussion | Topic subject | The whole SB police chief story is such a non-factor, speaks for itself. | Topic URL | http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=13354635&mesg_id=13356138 |
13356138, The whole SB police chief story is such a non-factor, speaks for itself. Posted by Lurkmode, Fri Nov-15-19 03:22 PM
> >I think what it is... is they don't produce news to inform. >Just massive info turds for people who already hate the same >people they hate or like the same people they like. Tbh I just >dislike aggressive opinion journalism in general, regardless >of format. So ya. >
You do know that you can click on the links they use in their stories and read from a different source.
Do you hate local news
https://www.abc57.com/news/insider-gives-details-on-scandal-origin-buttigieg-targeted-on-recordings
https://www.southbendtribune.com/news/publicsafety/south-bend-police-chief-ron-teachman-leaving-to-work-for/article_6ae06cf1-3ab8-50df-86d1-131d8fd95d7d.html
Do you hate city officials confirmed redacted Officer Reports ?
Do you hate campaign finance reports ?
>Anyway. I have no idea why they're so obsessed with him. Or >what tectonic shift in US democracy yall think will be caused >by the minute contextual details of "why" the illegall >eavesdropping on those calls began.
So misleading your friend with information that was wrong is just a "minute contextual detail" ?
But there's not really >anything new I could read about the case that could change my >position.
Oh see no evil, hear no evil, your mind is made up already.
I think racism in any police force is a problem and >should be dealt with accordingly. I also think the way those >officers went about trying to expose racism in their police >force was a problem to be dealt with accordingly. These are >not mutually exclusive ideas. >
Wait you think racism is a problem even though you just said "The whole SB police chief story is such a non-factor" ?
>What would yall have had a mayor do instead anyway? Knowingly >violate a federal statute to settle a personnel issue? Join >members of his police force in illegal activity being >investigated by the FBI? Exacerbate unrest in the city that >recently elected him based on the unsubstantiated claims of >police personnel under federal investigation?? Smh come on >
A mayor could investigate the racist police or tell his donors not to help the racist police. It's possible to do that without "knowingly violating a federal statute. The mayor doesn't have to join illegal activity to investigate racist cops. A cover up for racist cops is not the only solution that will keep the city peaceful. Seriously doing more to fight racism is not a stretch or wtf moment.
| |