Go back to previous topic
Forum nameGeneral Discussion
Topic subject "Exposing" is the correct choice, unless you see Pete through rose colored glasses
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=13354635&mesg_id=13356116
13356116, "Exposing" is the correct choice, unless you see Pete through rose colored glasses
Posted by Lurkmode, Fri Nov-15-19 01:11 PM
>It was interesting watching them hyperventilate over news
>items that those who had been following Pete's rise already
>knew about with greater nuance than they bothered to attempt.
>I can tolerate Cenk in small doses but for the most part, I
>find TYT super annoying and barely journalism.

You can read the stories on the site instead of watching them. Those following Pete's rise knew about documents that were just released ?

"New Documents Raise Questions About Buttigieg's Ouster of Black Police Chief
By: Jonathan LarsenSep 30, 2019"


They remind me
>of like Tucker Carlson but far left instead of far right and
>if he held panels instead of interviewing guests solo.


They are nothing like Carlson. Now if they said white supremacy is hoax then you could say they are similar to Carlson, and use the both sides thing.

>I still to this day think that whole SB police chief story is
>such a non-factor and, quite frankly, am not convinced I
>wouldn't have handled it differently if I were the executive
>in his situation lol.

WOW you gotta be kidding.

Factor
https://tyt.com/stories/4vZLCHuQrYE4uKagy0oyMA/7gQnJsWvexITGWgr36Sv9b

"Mike Schmuhl, Buttigieg’s presidential campaign manager who served as his mayoral chief of staff during the Boykins matter."

factor
https://tyt.com/stories/4vZLCHuQrYE4uKagy0oyMA/2bmmTSQD7wsAQXplMP6XVY

"Buttigieg has said he does not know what is on the tapes, but Duerring told TYT, “They knew exactly what was on those tapes,” because legal documents detailing the tapes’ contents were sent to the city.

The woman who heard the tapes, Karen DePaepe, also shared details with local media at the time. Her tort claim against the city, in June 2012, said, “a ranking police officer of the South Bend Police Department, as well as others within the Police Department, were engaged in serious acts of misconduct.”

>
>I tried to pose to a friend once what if a similar situation
>happened but with a data breach instead of a recording.

You mislead that friend.

https://tyt.com/stories/4vZLCHuQrYE4uKagy0oyMA/22kkCiHxZkbeKfsQZwkvIm

"It all began with an alarm from the SBPD’s Dynamics Instruments Reliant Recording System.

The system was supposed to back up digital audio recordings of SBPD phone lines automatically. When the system froze, DePaepe began checking the recordings. On February 4, 2011, noticing that the voice on one call didn’t match the officer assigned to that line, DePaepe listened to more calls, to determine whether the recording system had malfunctioned.

DePaepe didn’t realize it, but Captain Brian Young had gotten a new phone line from another officer who had just been promoted. And Young didn’t know that he had just inherited a phone line that was being automatically recorded. (In the Jan. 2012 Officer’s Report, DePaepe writes that a previous chief ordered numerous lines be recorded to capture calls alleging officer misconduct.)

Over the next several months, the recordings, according to the documents, tell a story involving some of the most powerful players in South Bend politics. But the trail started with a single ticket for a seat-belt violation: A ticket that Captain Young tried to fix."


>Like, imagine you're a newly hired director for some garden
>variety government agency. You've barely made it a year in
>your position when it comes to your attention that one of your
>employees has been under investigation by federal law
>enforcement for hacking into a classified hr database system
>bc he believed some of his fellow employees were racist and he
>was trying to find dirt on them. The deperment's inspector
>general and the fbi had been monitoring him since way before
>you even became this dude's boss, and you're being informed
>because if you or your division either accidentally or
>intentionally view, process, or do anything with this data
>he's been compiling you could be held criminally liable under
>federal law.
>

This is what your friend should see, instead of what you created.

https://tyt.com/stories/4vZLCHuQrYE4uKagy0oyMA/7g2z3FxEXeOR4ivsqXN5H1

>I'd be like *WTF* and dude could NOT stop doing what he's
>doing/leave the agency quickly enough. Whether his racism
>hunch was true or not, im not jeopardizing my or any of my
>employees freedom or livelihood bc this dude wants to be on
>some paranoid vigilante shit. There's a whole other mechanism
>to file racial discrimination complaints and he could have
>fucking did that. foh lol
>

Your WTF should be directed at Pete.