hasn't Vex been for impeachment? I could be wrong, but seems odd that he is suddenly against it now that it is happening...and that Tulsi came out against it (lol lol)

>and people who know better (in the political press) need to
>stop regurgitating it.
>
>in the midterms immediately following clintons
>impeachment...repubs held the senate with 0 net seat changes.
>repubs lost a measly 5 seats in the house but still retained
>control of it.

Right. No one has been able to explain to me how the GOP "paid the price" for impeaching, beyond lost seats. Which didn't amount to much.

>
>then they won the white house in 2000 (while using clinton as
>a weapon against gore. gained the senate in 2002. and kept
>control of the presidency and both chambers until 2006. they
>held the house for *12 years* during this time.

A lot of people gloss over this. If the GOP has "lost" since 98, please sign me up for losing.

>
>if anything...repubs showed impeachment (with even a failed
>conviction) can be a potent political weapon to strengthen
>your hand electorally.

The Dems just need to play it right.


I get that some are cautious, but some are just unwilling to think critically about this.