>So you've learned that individual polls usually don't give a
>statistically-significant measure of the race. That's
>progress.

It's never that simple or cut/dry - and surely you know that. Polling has become more laden with administrative issues than people were previously aware of - so with new information should come new methods of applying the data/polling itself.

But as to the matter at hand here which we are discussing - it's very clear that the aggregate data has shown a downward spiral for Warren's number in recent weeks - which you're not disputing here.

But if you'd like to lecture us on your theory re: the reliability of aggregate polling vs. individual polling - please knock yourself out.



-->

-->