13343488, But how is the value determined? Posted by auragin_boi, Fri Aug-16-19 10:33 AM
>conflating contractually obligated compensation with (what >appears to be) the overall strategy behind executive >(over)compensation. I reeeally really don't think CEOs are >compensated based on some calculus of how deserving they are >compared to workers, or how much more qualified, etc. I think >it's all about profits.
Why are contractual obligations guaranteed? Why don't they come with performance clauses? The CEO is already paid handsomely. Why add a contractually obligated payment regardless of performance?
>Like, you're 100% right. Shitty CEOs still get paid for their >work. But I think that's moreso in honor of whatever contract >was agreed to between the company and the executive, not >unlike the way shitty employees are also still paid for their >work. Shitty CEOs don't usually end up keeping their job, >though (eg. Marissa Mayer getting booted/asked to resign from >Yahoo is a recent example that comes to mind. She was still >paid handsomely.)
Does it really hurt to lose a job that paid you $260 mil to leave (yes, she got $260 mil)? C'mon. You act like losing that job is some detriment to her livelihood.
>In contrast, I think the crux of the overall strategy behind >executive (over)compensation is that those millions that a >board hands off to an executive is viewed more as a price to >pay for profits. Meaning, if they have somebody with whatever >combination of experience, network, strategy, and ruthlessness >who can consistently help them meet or exceed desired profit >targets, than X% of said profits is a reasonable price to pay >to make said profits.
And the rest of the workforce doesn't contribute to said profits? This is a cop out. Paying a livable wage 'should' be a cost of doing business mandate but because oligarchy is the norm in government, no one makes corporate greed accountable for the masses. So they conflate the importance of a CEO, pay them even if they fail and complain whenever the 10's of thousands of peasants say, 'it's hard to live on $11/hr in New York/DC/Chicago/LA/Houston/Atlanta, etc'.
How dare you ask for enough to keep up with inflation when we have to pay CEO's more than they've ever made in history?!?!
|