>
>Folks are in here throwing a hissy fit because some people
>didn't like the special.
>

No, the people who are throwing a hissy fit is the ones that are shocked and disappointed in Dave Chappelle's special.

>And there was no reason for me to add on?
>

No it wasn't unless you wanted to go at the overreaction by those bending over backwards to complain about a comedian telling jokes.

>I'm really not understanding why some of ya'll are so
>triggered and going to these lengths to defend this special.
>
>And I'm a Dave fan.
>

You don't understand because you are calling the wrong people triggered. Here is some examples of triggered

"he joke was "let's shame suicide"

"His voice is going bad- he'll sound like Lucille Ball soon. (Lucille Ball yelling at Mr. Mooney.)"

"If Dave keeps this up he'll get fanbase only the black Joe Rogan can dream of."

"if Breitbart is cosigning your shit to make THEIR point, you have to question yourself. "

and finally saying "See Dave's just being HONEST - and the guys above are also just being honest."

after making a list of right wing sites pushing an agenda.

>>
>>>
>>>
>>>And I'm sorry, but if Breitbart is cosigning your shit to
>>make
>>>THEIR point, you have to question yourself.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>lmao Trump co-signed MLK Jr and Breitbart ran a story about
>>it. If we agree with MLK Jr do we have to question ourselves
>>?
>
>Do you really, honestly, think this is the same?
>

It's the same tactic they always use.

>Can you really not see the difference?
>

You think Breibart is co-signing Dave ?

>I'm going to assume you do, but are just making an absurd
>comparison to make some kind of point.
>
>
>

You think Breibart is on the level and a credible source ? You giving them that much credit ?