>like republicans.
>
>you have prime prospective senate candidates and a liberal
>billionaire wasting resources on pointless presidential
>campaigns.

Yet there's *so* much tension within the Democratic tent. So much pettiness from the top-down of Dem leadership.

>why put up all these unnecesssary balls in the air instead of
>just locking down the simplest paths to power and
>concentrating on winnable elections?

Not sure I agree there. Dems need to be much bolder with their composite strategy. Focusing on winnable elections is efficient - of course - but a bolder strategy should be embraced: take on fights in districts which traditionally don't seem so favorable, and make the case to voters. Appeal to their humanity, win the argument with Republicans and others who have pockets of the electorate transfixed in a tired, old narrative that's set to die.

Dems don't just need to share the ball, they need to actually look for opportunities to create wins with creativity and forward-thinking momentum.


-->