>That purpose is pretending that the immediate cause of the
>baby's death isn't worthy of legal or moral attention. Which
>permits you to treat the body of a pregnant woman as
>permanently under the control of the state.
>

Wrong! I'm not pretending about anything and I not associating that the body of a pregnant woman belongs to the state. You're going way overboard to justify an opinion.



>>For example (Total Hypothetical for conversation's sake):
>What
>>if Jones was babysitting your child and had taken your child
>>with her to instigate a fight and the child was shot and
>>killed. Who would you believe was the cause for the shooting
>>death of your child, the shooter or Jones?
>
>The person who shot my baby would be the person that caused my
>baby to be shot.

OK. So you're saying that you'd find no fault in Jone's actions? In you're eyes she would not be complicit?

You're that same person that thinks billionaire are evil and that their greed contributes to evil deeds. So.. man let me stop.



The root cause is really de devaluing of Black Life (Human Life) that brought about the entire situation. We can argue about the State Law, the police actions, the issues in the justice system. But the bottom line is that neither of these women valued the lives of each other or the unborn child. But I'll let you argue the responses. I'll make my case for the cause.




.
.

“It was the evidence from science and history that prompted me to abandon my atheism and become a Christian.” — Lee Strobel, The Case for Christ

Looking for Good News: https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org