I'm lost. I listened to Serial. I plan to watch the doc, and I am saying that I don't really have much interest in hearing another podcast about the same case especially if it's clearly from the point of view as Serial. It might be superior, but I don't care enough to do it all again especially if it doesn't answer my question about Jay.

Da hell you talking about books for?

Am I missing something?





>Im sure the doc will do just fine.
>
>But if you genuinely wanted the best possible understanding of
>the issues with the case against him, you'd go to the best
>available resource.
>
>You're a reader. You know the book is alqays better.
>
>Going Clear, the scientology doc, did a good job, but doesn't
>approach the depths explored in the book on which it was
>based.
>
>Chasing Madoff is a solid doc on how Madoff got taken down,
>but the book written by Harry Markopolos (on which the doc is
>based) does the job so much better.
>
>So if you're this firy entrenched in your belief in his guilt,
>but would prefer the Reader's Digest version of the best
>available case favoring his defense, that paints a rather
>clear picture of bias on your part.
>
>You want the guy to be guilty more than you want a grasp of
>the available information in his favor.


**********
"Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson

"what's a leader if he isn't reluctant"