I reread and I popped off for sure. I also wasn't very articulate, so I'm taking several well-deserved Ls for that post.


>I responded at all haha. But yea no judgement at all. Just
>wanted to ease some unnecessary tensions.

My point that it was built up was so you didn't think I just went temporarily crazy or something...there was background, at least to me.

That said, not an excuse for my tone and general sloppiness lol.


>Re: the subject of AOC and "backing" more centrist dems, I'll
>come back to address that - gotta run to a meeting. But I do
>think you may be misinterpreting what Reeq's been saying a
>little bit. That's my perception at least. But again I'll
>respond in more detail a little later.


Maybe. I have no personal agenda here, other than feeling like he has basically shrugged me off and/or dismissed lately when I've disagreed with him. I'm open to being wrong, but it definitely seems like a pattern.




>
>
>
>>he doesn't really engage in quality discourse if you
>disagree
>>with him. Not lately anyway. He disappears, deflects, or
>>dismisses.
>>
>>I admit my initial response was over the top and not well
>>thought out. I got rightfully called on it by you and
>>others.
>>
>>
>>But it was in response to several other posts- a culmination
>>of other shit.
>>
>>
>>You certainly can disagree, but please don't judge based on
>>that response only.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Establishment ?! "Bubble" !!? C'mon dogg. You've shared
>>>enough quality discourse w/Reeq to know damn well that's
>not
>>>where he's @. In this case, as in most cases, he's trying
>to
>>>evaluate the situation objectively and realistically rather
>>>than idealistically.
>>>
>>>I gripe w/a lot of what you said below but I'll let Reeq
>>speak
>>>for himself. All I'll say is it seems like you're going in
>>for
>>>no reason, and putting words in his mouth/stating his
>>>positions (wrongly) for him.
>>>
>>>
>>>>You’re going full establishment lately.
>>>>
>>>>That Amazon deal was horse shit. And you are severely
>>>>over-rating their image. Lol at people “trusting” the
>>>>institution of Amazon. Especially in a district that’s
>>>>70-80% Dem. Youre just making up shit.
>>>>
>>>>Low turnout in the primary? Lol, when was the last time
>>>>Crowley even faced a primary? What are you comparing
>>>>it to?
>>>>
>>>>Lol their campaign worked on getting non-voters to
>>>>vote. Why does that upset the establishment so
>>>>much?
>>>>
>>>>I see you’ve moved the goalpost on her polling
>>>>too.
>>>>
>>>>So do national polls on congress reps matter or not?
>>>>
>>>>You keep making claims with no real support, “That’s
>>>>how you get a pink slip” etc...do you have examples?
>>>>
>>>>Reeq, you should take some time off from your bubble. Talk
>>>>to some non Dems, etc. Youre slipping.
>>>>
>>>>Your “I want her to stay, I’m on her side, she should
>>>just
>>>>play
>>>>nice and/orshut up” is some bullshit man.
>>>>
>>>>Like I’ve said, the way y’all shit on the base is
>>>unreal.
>>>>Then
>>>>you wonder why the GOPs bass is more loyal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>