>which is understandable as our media does a horrible job of
>reporting outside of the bubble.

Okay, that is a fair point. It could also be that it isn't everyone's top priority- like it is yours.

Not saying either is right or wrong of course.

>
>>shit like this
>>
>>https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1111386620698083329
>
>yea I'm not sure why this is such a deal-breaker for people.
>The RussiaGate Rachel Maddow obsession on this is wasted
>energy. The notion that Robert Mueller (someone who has
>played defense for the Establishment for decades) was going to
>be the savior to indict Trump was always a hail mary approach
>to countering Trump's criminality (and he is a criminal).
>
>I also think the building up of Russia as this cold war
>resurgent boogey-man is wildly mis-placed. It wasn't long ago
>when Obama was mocking Mitt Romney for referring to Russia as
>our biggest threat/challenge - and Obama was right. This
>doesn't mean that Russia is a friend - as they clearly have
>tried to influence our elections. But the notion that our
>elections are so pristine - while ignoring all of the
>meddling/interference we run in other elections is absurd.
>Also - Israel has meddled in our elections far more than
>Russia - but there's no hysteria aimed there. It's
>intellectually dishonest.
>


I actually have no beef with what you said here- in fact I agree your overall sentiment for the most part.

But it isn't what SHE said. I think sometimes you meet her *at least* half way on some of this stuff because you like her so much.

Which, again- cool. But don't expect everyone to do that- or at least please don't call us all lazy, etc.


I mean, it is reckless *at best* for her to pretend she knows whats in the report, allude to the investigation being partisan, etc.

But then the Civil War shit? Cmon man. That is loony and Trump-style fear mongering. TF was she thinking?


>Most of the anti-Tulsi stuff I see is pretty disingenuous.
>That said - there are of course substantive reasons why
>somebody wouldn't support her - but I rarely see those being
>discussed.
>
>-->

Okay, cool. Her saying "chill you partisan libs, had Trump been indicted we could have had a civil war" is a genuine concern for some of us.


But we know where each other stands on Tusli and I don't think for one second I'm going to change your mind. Just think you're too quick to dismiss people who have issues with her as uninformed.