>What are you basing that on? The fact that they she met with
>Trump to discuss foreign policy? I feel like I'm having '08
>flashbacks when the right was lambasting Obama for saying he'd
>speak with enemies and/or perceived enemies to have a
>dialogue. Tulsi meeting with Trump to persuade him to not go
>to war with Iran/Syria does not mean that she was up for a
>cabinet position.

trumps own transition team said she was up for a cabinet position.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/democratic-rep-tulsi-gabbard-consideration-trump-cabinet/story?id=43696303



>I just want people to be consistent in their outrage. Bannon
>agrees with nothing about Tulsi's progressive platform except
>perhaps non-interventionist foreign policy and her view that
>refugees should be vetted (which I disagree with because
>refugees are already vetted w/ extensive thoroughness).
>
>Not sure what people are asking here. Since David Duke is
>against intervention in Syria to help Israel - should Tulsi
>adopt the opposite view of him to appease the critics? What
>if Bannon says: "I like her environmental policy" - should she
>then say "oh we can't have that! let's change our
>environmental policy."
>
>This is a silly game of holding people guilty by association -
>but in this sense it's not even association because she's
>outright rebuking their support (just like AOC is).
>
>We're better than these cheap attacks and smears.


ok so why did she start following alt right (and david duke allied) figures on twitter? (reply #131 again).

you really have the blinders on when it comes to this woman.